Back
Latest News
UK Court Upholds Enforcement of HK$ 500M Arbitration Award
Neutral Citation Number: [2023] EWHC 1964 (Comm)
Court: High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Commercial Court (KBD)
Date: 28 July 2023
Judge: Mr. Justice Bright
Introduction
This case revolves around the enforcement of a New York Convention arbitration award under section 101 of the Arbitration Act 1996, with the defendant invoking the public policy exception under section 101(3). The central issue was whether enforcing the award would infringe the defendant's rights under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, as she claimed she was a consumer residing in the UK. The court was tasked with balancing the principles of international arbitration enforcement against potential consumer protection violations.
Background
Parties Involved:
-
Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (Claimant): Eternity Sky is a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and registered in Hong Kong. It is part of a corporate group that conducts its business primarily in Hong Kong and the People's Republic of China (PRC).
-
Mrs. Xiaomin Zhang (Defendant): Mrs. Zhang is a resident of London. She moved from Hong Kong to London in 2013 and was the wife of the late Mr. Zhang, who managed Chong Sing Fin Tech Holdings Group Limited.
Key Agreements:
-
Personal Guarantee: Mrs. Zhang signed a personal guarantee on 8 May 2016, ensuring the obligations of Chong Sing in relation to a bond issue. The guarantee included clauses outlining her responsibilities and the legal framework governing the agreement.
-
Subscription Agreement: This agreement, dated the same day as the Personal Guarantee, involved Chong Sing issuing HK$ 500,000,000 in convertible bonds to Eternity Sky. The performance of Chong Sing was guaranteed by both Mr. and Mrs. Zhang.
Critical Events:
Mrs. Zhang signed the Personal Guarantee without reading it or obtaining legal advice. She was on holiday in Spain at the time, and the document was sent to her by Mr. Zhang’s personal assistant, who explained it was necessary for a bond issue.
Mr. Zhang, her late husband, controlled Chong Sing, which was heavily indebted to Eternity Sky's corporate group.
The bond issue and associated agreements were governed by Hong Kong law and subject to arbitration in Hong Kong.
Key Legal Points
Personal Guarantee Provisions:
Clauses 2 and 17 of the Personal Guarantee detailed the obligations and arbitration process.
Mrs. Zhang’s evidence revealed she signed the guarantee without reading it and based on her husband’s instructions, reflecting a pattern of behavior.
Arbitration Proceedings:
Mrs. Zhang initiated arbitration in Hong Kong, challenging the validity of the Personal Guarantee on the grounds of lack of agreement, undue influence, and unconscionable bargain.
The arbitration took place virtually, with Mrs. Zhang represented by legal counsel and actively participating in the proceedings.
Arbitrator's Findings:
The arbitrator found that Mrs. Zhang was aware of the implications of signing the guarantee. Despite her claims, her actions indicated a pattern of signing documents related to her husband's business without due diligence.
The arbitrator concluded that Mrs. Zhang intended to enter into legal relations and was bound by the guarantee. Her negligence in not reading the document or seeking legal advice did not absolve her of responsibility.
The arbitrator rejected her claims of lack of agreement, undue influence, and unconscionable bargain, and awarded Eternity Sky HK$ 500,000,000 plus interest and costs.
Proceedings
Enforcement Order:
Eternity Sky sought enforcement of the arbitration award in the UK.
An initial enforcement order was granted without notice, allowing Mrs. Zhang to apply for a set-aside.
Mrs. Zhang's Set-Aside Application:
Mrs. Zhang applied to set aside the enforcement order, invoking the public policy exception and consumer protection laws.
The court considered the circumstances of her signing the Personal Guarantee and her understanding of its implications.
Judgment
Enforcement of Arbitration Award:
Mr. Justice Bright upheld the enforcement of the arbitration award. He found that Mrs. Zhang had sufficient understanding and intent when signing the Personal Guarantee, despite her claims to the contrary.
The court emphasized the importance of upholding international arbitration awards under the New York Convention, noting that Mrs. Zhang's negligence in not reading the document or seeking advice did not constitute grounds to invalidate the award.
The judgment reaffirmed that the public policy exception under section 101(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 is narrow and should not be used to undermine the enforcement of international arbitration awards, except in clear cases of public policy violations.
Consumer Rights Argument:
The court addressed Mrs. Zhang's argument regarding the Consumer Rights Act 2015, finding that her situation did not fit the typical consumer protection scenario envisaged by the Act.
It was noted that Mrs. Zhang's involvement in signing the guarantee was linked to substantial financial and business interests, which placed her outside the usual scope of consumer protection.
Conclusion
The case highlights the complexities of international arbitration enforcement and the importance of understanding legal obligations in personal guarantees. Mrs. Zhang's application to set aside the enforcement order was denied, reaffirming the binding nature of the arbitration award under the New York Convention.
- The UK High Court enforced a HK$ 500 million arbitration award against Mrs. Xiaomin Zhang, rejecting her defenses based on consumer rights and undue influence.
- Eternity Sky sought to enforce the Hong Kong arbitration award in the UK, leading to an initial enforcement order granted without notice.
- Mr. Justice Bright confirmed the enforcement of the arbitration award, concluding that it did not breach public policy or Mrs. Zhang's consumer rights.
