Latest News


Indian Mediation Act: A Likely Possibility?

With an expanding number of authoritative connections appearing, the quantity of debates is on the ascent and courts are presently overburdened with cases and understaffed with judges. Along these lines, individuals, legal counselors, and even appointed authorities, have started moving in the direction of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) to offer some comfort and quick equity to gatherings to a debate who, as a rule, need to safeguard the idea of their relationship. Substitute Dispute Resolution is a sweeping term covering techniques for debate goal, where nonpartisan third individual tunes in to the two players in a question and either settle the issue, on account of assertion or encourage a discussion which prompts a neighborly understanding, as on account of intercession, mollification, exchange, and Lok Adalat. Discretion has been by and by since the long stretches of frontier rule and Conciliation were brought into enactment through the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Since these two ADR systems have discovered their way into explicit enactments drafted to set out their procedural principles, they are standardized and are wanted to different strategies for ADR like intercession. Nonetheless, the idea of numerous connections that frequently end up in contest are delicate and gatherings might want to keep up the relationship and intervention has offered comfort here. Intercession is a procedure by which a middle person encourages a discussion between the gatherings, subsequently permitting them to cooperate and impart straightforwardly and sincerely instead of them facing a lawful conflict against one another in court.

Because of the idea of intervention whereby it takes into account participation instead of hostility, it has discovered expanded legal acknowledgment in India with the lawmaking body as of late presenting it in the Companies Act 2013, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, just as the Commercial Courts Act 2015, among others. The nearness of an arrangement alluding questions that emerge under these enactments to intercession is a positive development yet obligatory intervention is regularly seen negatively as intimidation and intervention isn't systematized and normalized enough to urge gatherings to willfully take part in private intercession. The Supreme Court perceived this imperfection in the legitimate framework and in a judgment intended to look at the practicality of setting up a Mediation Authority for engine vehicle mishaps, the court adopted an all the more wide calculated strategy in saying that intervention could be utilized for engine vehicle guarantees as well as to settle different questions too and to this end, a complete enactment administering intercession ought to be authorized in India[1].

The huge number of passings ascribed to street mishaps consistently in India – around 147,000 individuals kicked the bucket in 2017 alone, and the ascent in mishap claims, which adds to the current excess of pending case cases, as an immediate aftereffect of this prompted the Supreme Court, on March 5, 2019, to consider setting up a Motor Accident Mediation Authority in each locale with the goal that street mishap cases can be settled in a rapid and genial manner[2]. Thinking about the circumstance in India, intercession appears to be a superb plan to manage the rising number of engine asserts however there is an absence of lawful foundation with regards to intervention procedure[3]. As the law stands now, intervention alluded by a court under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure keeps rules set somewhere around the court and despite the fact that the Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2004 exist, they are deficiently drafted and appear to be lifted from the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court considered this worry and noticed that "the manner in which the intervention development is making up for the lost time in this nation, there is a critical need to institute an Indian Mediation Act too," and adding to this it opined that "we urge the administration to likewise consider the attainability of ordering an Indian Mediation Act to deal with different parts of intercession in general[4]."


An 'Indian Mediation Act' as recommended by the Supreme Court is without a doubt a promising proposition for India which is a nation in critical need of appropriately drafted and formalized rules and system for intercession which will be consistently perceived and followed. The shortage of clear procedural direction for intercession has prompted a general absence of certainty and vulnerability in the intervention procedure in India and an exhaustive rule will surely clear up the muddle[5]. Notwithstanding a fa reaching enactment, nonetheless, the nation should likewise endeavor to assemble a network of devoted and able middle people who are prepared by perceived intercession establishments in the nation. Starting at now there is a vastly improved intervention culture in the nation on account of the 1996 rule on discretion and appeasement so one can dare to dream that the ongoing push from the Supreme Court will make an ascent in open mindfulness and bump the Legislature to authorize an intercession explicit resolution that will make the nation progressively open to interceding questions and help cure this circumstance.


[1] Ajmer Singh, Supreme Court forms committee to draft mediation law, will send to the government, EconomicTimes, (Jan. 19, 2020, 11:40 PM),

[2] M.R. Krishna Murthi v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2019) Civil Appeal No. 2476-2477.

[3] Shruti Mahajan, Breaking: Dire Need to Enact Indian Mediation Act, Supreme Court, Bar&Bench, (Mar. 5, 2019, 7:48 PM),

[4] M.R. Krishna Murthi v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2019) Civil Appeal No. 2476-2477.

[5] Mridul Godha, A Renewed Interest in Mediation in India, MediationBlog, (Mar. 30, 2019, 5:57 PM),




All Latest News